Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Should he have been fired? Not if that was the only thing he said. Was it problematic? Yes and no. It’s good to admit fear and bias. But to blame it on someone’s “choice to identify” as a Muslim, is a problem. The choice not to assimilate should not make someone suspect.
Oppenheimer Investigations Group has been named to the “Top Boutiques 2021” list by the Daily Journal, California’s largest legal newspaper. The annual list recognizes specialty firms in California with a large portfolio of complex and impactful matters. One of only 20 firms honored, OIG is recognized in the area of employment law. In its coverage […]
